Mazda 3 2003 vs Honda Civic 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.3 - 2.3 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 84 - 160 HP | 90 - 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 122 - 245 NM | 130 - 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 - 14.3 seconds | 6.6 - 14.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 - 8.2 | 5.0 - 8.9 | |
|
Mazda 3 petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Honda Civic. On average, a Mazda 3 with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Honda Civic. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.45 m | 4.14 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Mazda 3 is larger. Mazda 3 is 31 cm longer than the Honda Civic, 6 cm wider, while the height of Mazda 3 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 481 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
878 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 12.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 3 is 1.9 metres less than that of the Honda Civic, which means Mazda 3 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`728 | ~ 1`133 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.2/10 | 8.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 3 has
|
Honda Civic has
| |