Mazda 2 2006 vs Mazda 2 2003

 
Mazda 2
2006 - 2007
Mazda 2
2003 - 2006
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.4 Diesel1.4 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 68 HP68 HP
Torque: 160 NM160 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 15 seconds15 seconds
Mazda 2 2006 and Mazda 2 2003 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.74.5
Real fuel consumption: 5.3 l/100km5.3 l/100km
By specification Mazda 2 2006 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2 2003, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda 2 2006 could require 30 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres45 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 950 km in combined cycle1000 km in combined cycle
1070 km on highway1120 km on highway
840 km with real consumption840 km with real consumption
Mazda 2 2003 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 420'000 km420'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 6 years6 years

Dimensions

Length: 3.92 m3.92 m
Width: 1.68 m1.68 m
Height: 1.53 m1.54 m
Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 2 2006 and Mazda 2 2003 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 268 litres267 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1044 litres1044 litres
Mazda 2 2006 has 1 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 2 2003.
Turning diameter: 9.8 meters9.8 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`5301`530
Safety: no data
Quality:
high

high
Average price (€): 16001400
Pros and Cons:
    Mazda 2 has
    • more full fuel tank mileage
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv