Mazda 2 2009 vs Mazda 2 2008
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 90 HP | 103 HP | |
Torque: | 205 NM | 137 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
Mazda 2 2008 is a more dynamic driving. Mazda 2 2009 engine produces 13 HP less power than Mazda 2 2008, but torque is 68 NM more than Mazda 2 2008. Due to the lower power, Mazda 2 2009 reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 | 5.9 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 5.1 l/100km | 7.0 l/100km | |
The Mazda 2 2009 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda 2 2009 consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2 2008, which means that by driving the Mazda 2 2009 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 255 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda 2 2009 consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2 2008. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 43 litres | 43 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1020 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
1160 km on highway | 870 km on highway | ||
840 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
Mazda 2 2009 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.90 m | 3.90 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.48 m | 1.48 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 2 2009 and Mazda 2 2008 are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 250 litres | 250 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
787 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.8 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`540 | 1`485 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | average | average | |
Average price (€): | 2400 | 2400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 2 has
|
Mazda 2 has
| |