Mazda 2 2006 vs Mazda 2 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 - 1.6 | 1.2 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 - 100 HP | 68 - 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 110 - 160 NM | 110 - 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 - 15.1 seconds | 11.4 - 16 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 - 6.7 | 4.5 - 7.1 | |
|
Mazda 2 2006 petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mazda 2 2003. On average, Mazda 2 2006 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2 2003. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.92 m | 3.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.54 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda 2 2006 and Mazda 2 2003 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 268 litres | 267 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1044 litres | 1044 litres | |
| Mazda 2 2006 has 1 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 2 2003. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`507 | ~ 1`512 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 2 has
|
| |