Mazda 2 2007 vs Renault Clio 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mazda 2 is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Renault Clio is available only with manual gearbox. | |||
| Engines: | 1.3 - 1.6 | 1.1 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 - 103 HP | 75 - 197 HP | |
| Torque: | 121 - 205 NM | 105 - 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 - 15.5 seconds | 6.9 - 13.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 - 6.8 | 4.7 - 8.9 | |
|
Mazda 2 petrol engines consumes on average 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Renault Clio. On average, Mazda 2 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.90 m | 4.02 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.49 m | |
|
Mazda 2 is smaller. Mazda 2 is 12 cm shorter than the Renault Clio, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda 2 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 250 litres | 288 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
787 litres | no data | |
|
Renault Clio has more luggage space. Mazda 2 has 38 litres less trunk space than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda 2 is 1.2 metres less than that of the Renault Clio, which means Mazda 2 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`496 | ~ 1`623 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda 2 has
|
Renault Clio has
| |