Lexus RX 1997 vs Land Rover Range Rover 1995
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 201 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 283 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 17.5 seconds | |
|
Lexus RX is more dynamic to drive. Lexus RX engine produces 65 HP more power than Land Rover Range Rover, whereas torque is 13 NM more than Land Rover Range Rover. Thanks to more power Lexus RX reaches 100 km/h speed 8.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.0 | 11.4 | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Lexus RX consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Lexus RX could require 240 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 73 litres | 90 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 560 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 700 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.58 m | 4.71 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.82 m | |
|
Lexus RX is smaller. Lexus RX is 13 cm shorter than the Land Rover Range Rover, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Lexus RX is 16 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 489 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1725 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.2 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Lexus RX is 0.3 metres more than that of the Land Rover Range Rover. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`270 | 3`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Lexus RX has
|
Land Rover Range Rover has
| |