Lexus RX 2009 vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2009

 
Lexus RX
2009 - 2012
Land Rover Range Rover Sport
2009 - 2013
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 3.5 Petrol3.0 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain and belt

Performance

Power: 277 HP245 HP
Torque: 346 NM600 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8 seconds9.3 seconds
Lexus RX is more dynamic to drive.
Lexus RX engine produces 32 HP more power than Land Rover Range Rover Sport, but torque is 254 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Sport. Thanks to more power Lexus RX reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 10.69.2
The Land Rover Range Rover Sport is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Lexus RX consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Lexus RX could require 210 litres more fuel.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Engines

Engine production duration: 20 years15 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota RAV4, Toyota Camry, Toyota Sienna, Lexus ESInstalled on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Land Rover Discovery
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Lexus RX might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.74 m4.78 m
Width: 1.89 m2.00 m
Height: 1.69 m1.78 m
Lexus RX is smaller.
Lexus RX is 4 cm shorter than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, 12 cm narrower, while the height of Lexus RX is 9 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no datano data
Turning diameter: 11.4 metersno data
Gross weight (kg): 2`5453`175
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 13 60010 200
Pros and Cons: Lexus RX has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv