Lexus RX 2009 vs Honda CR-V 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lexus RX is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Honda CR-V has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 3.5 | 2.0 - 2.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 249 - 277 HP | 150 - 166 HP | |
| Torque: | 317 - 346 NM | 192 - 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 - 8 seconds | 10.2 - 12.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 - 10.6 | 7.4 - 9.5 | |
|
Lexus RX petrol engines consumes on average 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Honda CR-V. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.76 m | 4.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Lexus RX is larger. Lexus RX is 22 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 7 cm wider, while the height of Lexus RX is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 446 litres | 524 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1570 litres | no data | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Lexus RX has 78 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. This could mean that the Lexus RX uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.2 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Lexus RX is 0.4 metres more than that of the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`475 | ~ 2`097 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 13 600 | 8600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Lexus RX has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |