Lexus RC 2014 vs Jaguar F-Type 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.0 Petrol | 5.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 467 HP | 550 HP | |
| Torque: | 527 NM | 680 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 4.1 seconds | |
| Lexus RC engine produces 83 HP less power than Jaguar F-Type, whereas torque is 153 NM less than Jaguar F-Type. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.3 | 11.3 | |
|
The Jaguar F-Type is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Lexus RC consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar F-Type, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Lexus RC could require 150 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 530 km in combined cycle | 610 km in combined cycle | |
| 700 km on highway | 820 km on highway | ||
| Jaguar F-Type gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 130 mm (5.1 inches) | 100 mm (3.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Lexus RC can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Lexus RC version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from two 4x4 versions of Lexus RC 2014 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jaguar F-Type engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Lexus IS, Lexus LS | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Jaguar XKR, Jaguar XK, Jaguar XJ, Jaguar XF, Jaguar F-Pace | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jaguar F-Type might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Lexus RC engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.31 m | |
| Lexus RC is 21 cm longer than the Jaguar F-Type, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Lexus RC is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 286 litres | 310 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 408 litres | |
|
Jaguar F-Type has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Lexus RC has 24 litres less trunk space than the Jaguar F-Type. This could mean that the Lexus RC uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Lexus RC is 0.5 metres less than that of the Jaguar F-Type, which means Lexus RC can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`150 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 23 000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Lexus RC has
|
Jaguar F-Type has
| |