Lexus LX 2007 vs Mazda CX-9 2007

 
Lexus LX
2007 - 2012
Mazda CX-9
2007 - 2009
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 5.7 Petrol3.5 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 367 HP263 HP
Torque: 530 NM339 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.5 secondsn/a seconds
Lexus LX engine produces 104 HP more power than Mazda CX-9, whereas torque is 191 NM more than Mazda CX-9.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 14.511.5
The Mazda CX-9 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Lexus LX consumes 3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-9, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Lexus LX could require 450 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 93 litres76 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 640 km in combined cycle660 km in combined cycle
810 km on highway770 km on highway

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Front wheel drive (FWD)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 840'000 km420'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Lexus LX engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 17 years1 years
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Lexus LX might be a better choice in this respect.
Hydraulic tappets: yesno
The Lexus LX engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.

Dimensions

Length: 4.99 m5.07 m
Width: 1.97 m1.94 m
Height: 1.92 m1.73 m
Lexus LX is 8 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-9, 3 cm wider, while the height of Lexus LX is 19 cm higher.
Seats: 8 seats7 seats
Trunk capacity: 430 litres487 litres
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: no data487 litres
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: 430 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
2560 litres2852 litres
The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-9 (by 292 litres).
Turning diameter: 12.8 metersno data
Gross weight (kg): 3`3002`635
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 26 8006800
Pros and Cons: Lexus LX has
  • more power
  • has 4x4 drive
  • longer expected engine lifespan
Mazda CX-9 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv