Lexus LX 1998 vs Honda CR-V 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lexus LX is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Honda CR-V has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 4.7 (petrol) | 2.0 - 2.4 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 234 - 275 HP | 140 - 162 HP | |
| Torque: | 328 - 438 NM | 190 - 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 seconds | 10.6 - 12 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 16.0 | 6.7 - 10.1 | |
|
Lexus LX petrol engines consumes on average 6.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Honda CR-V. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.89 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Lexus LX is larger. Lexus LX is 28 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 16 cm wider, while the height of Lexus LX is 14 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 541 litres | 527 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2510 litres | 952 litres | |
| Lexus LX has 14 litres more trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Lexus LX (by 1558 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.1 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Lexus LX is 1.5 metres more than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Lexus LX can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`112 | ~ 1`910 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 12 000 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Lexus LX has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |