Lexus LX 2012 vs Mazda CX-9 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Lexus LX is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Mazda CX-9 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Mazda CX-9 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 5.7 | 3.7 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 367 - 383 HP | 273 - 277 HP | |
| Torque: | 530 - 546 NM | 367 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.5 - 14.8 | 11.3 | |
|
Lexus LX petrol engines consumes on average 3.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda CX-9. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Ground clearance: | 225 mm (8.9 inches) | 203 mm (8 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Lexus LX can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.01 m | 5.10 m | |
| Width: | 1.97 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.92 m | 1.73 m | |
| Lexus LX is 9 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-9, 3 cm wider, while the height of Lexus LX is 19 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 701 litres | 487 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2353 litres | 2852 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Lexus LX has 214 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-9. The Mazda CX-9 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-9 (by 499 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.9 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`300 | ~ 2`712 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 65 000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Lexus LX has
|
Mazda CX-9 has
| |