Lexus LX 2012 vs Land Rover Range Rover 2009
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 5.7 (petrol) | 3.6 - 5.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 367 - 383 HP | 272 - 510 HP | |
| Torque: | 530 - 546 NM | 510 - 700 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 seconds | 6.2 - 9.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.5 - 14.8 | 9.4 - 14.9 | |
|
Lexus LX petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Land Rover Range Rover. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.01 m | 4.97 m | |
| Width: | 1.97 m | 2.03 m | |
| Height: | 1.92 m | 1.87 m | |
| Lexus LX is 3 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Lexus LX is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 701 litres | 535 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2353 litres | no data | |
|
Lexus LX has more luggage capacity. Lexus LX has 166 litres more trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.9 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Lexus LX is 0.9 metres more than that of the Land Rover Range Rover, which means Lexus LX can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`300 | ~ 3`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 65 000 | 15 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Lexus LX has
|
Land Rover Range Rover has
| |