Lexus LS 2000 vs Lexus LS 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.3 Petrol | 4.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 281 HP | 282 HP | |
| Torque: | 417 NM | 417 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.7 seconds | 6.3 seconds | |
|
Lexus LS 2003 is a more dynamic driving. Lexus LS 2000 engine produces 1 HP less power than Lexus LS 2003, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Lexus LS 2000 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.1 | 11.4 | |
|
The Lexus LS 2003 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Lexus LS 2000 consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Lexus LS 2003, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Lexus LS 2000 could require 105 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 84 litres | 84 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| Lexus LS 2003 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 13 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.00 m | 5.02 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.47 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Lexus LS 2000 is 2 cm shorter than the Lexus LS 2003, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 552 litres | 570 litres | |
| Lexus LS 2000 has 18 litres less trunk space than the Lexus LS 2003. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`350 | 2`340 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 6200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Lexus LS has
|
Lexus LS has
| |