Lexus LS 2012 vs Mercedes S class 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.6 Petrol | 4.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 386 HP | 456 HP | |
| Torque: | 493 NM | 700 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.7 seconds | 4.8 seconds | |
|
Mercedes S class is a more dynamic driving. Lexus LS engine produces 70 HP less power than Mercedes S class, whereas torque is 207 NM less than Mercedes S class. Due to the lower power, Lexus LS reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.7 | 9.1 | |
|
The Mercedes S class is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Lexus LS consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes S class, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Lexus LS could require 240 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 84 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 870 km in combined cycle | |
| 1070 km on highway | 1120 km on highway | ||
| Mercedes S class gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.09 m | 5.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.49 m | |
|
Lexus LS is smaller. Lexus LS is 16 cm shorter than the Mercedes S class, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Lexus LS is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 510 litres | 510 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`455 | 2`730 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 23 400 | 66 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Lexus LS has
|
Mercedes S klase has
| |