Lexus LS 2017 vs Chrysler 300C 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 3.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 315 HP | 305 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 358 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.5 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Lexus LS engine produces 10 HP more power than Chrysler 300C, whereas torque is 22 NM more than Chrysler 300C. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.6 | 11.2 | |
|
The Lexus LS is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Lexus LS consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler 300C, which means that by driving the Lexus LS over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 82 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
| 1070 km on highway | 800 km on highway | ||
| Lexus LS gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.24 m | 5.04 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.48 m | |
| Lexus LS is 19 cm longer than the Chrysler 300C, width is practically the same , while the height of Lexus LS is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 480 litres | 462 litres | |
| Lexus LS has 18 litres more trunk space than the Chrysler 300C. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`585 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 54 000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Lexus LS has
|
Chrysler 300C has
| |