Lexus LS 2003 vs Mercedes S class 2002

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Lexus LS
2003 - 2006
Mercedes S class
2002 - 2005
Gearbox: Automatic Automatic
Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Lexus LS is available only with rear wheel drive, while Mercedes S class can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive.
Engines: 4.3 (petrol)3.2 - 5.5 (petrol, diesel)

Performance

Power: 282 - 290 HP204 - 500 HP
Torque: 417 - 434 NM350 - 800 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6.1 - 6.3 seconds4.8 - 8.2 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.6 - 11.47.7 - 14.8
Lexus LS petrol engines consumes on average 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mercedes S class.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 5.02 m5.10 m
Width: 1.83 m1.86 m
Height: 1.47 m1.44 m
Both cars are similar in size. Lexus LS is 8 cm shorter than the Mercedes S class, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Lexus LS is 3 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 570 litresno data
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters12.2 meters
The turning circle of the Lexus LS is 1.3 metres less than that of the Mercedes S class, which means Lexus LS can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`335~ 2`100
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): 62003600
Pros and Cons: Lexus LS has
  • only petrol engines available
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
Mercedes S klase has
  • available with 4x4 drive
  • petrol and diesel engines available
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv