Lexus LS 2003 vs Mercedes C class 2000
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lexus LS is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Mercedes C class has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Lexus LS is available only with rear wheel drive, while Mercedes C class can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 4.3 (petrol) | 1.8 - 3.2 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 282 - 290 HP | 115 - 354 HP | |
| Torque: | 417 - 434 NM | 185 - 540 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.1 - 6.3 seconds | 5.2 - 12.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.6 - 11.4 | 6.1 - 11.5 | |
|
On average, the Lexus LS petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Mercedes C class. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.02 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Lexus LS is larger. Lexus LS is 49 cm longer than the Mercedes C class, 10 cm wider, while the height of Lexus LS is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 570 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Lexus LS is 0.1 metres more than that of the Mercedes C class. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`335 | ~ 1`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 6200 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Lexus LS has
|
Mercedes C klase has
| |