Lexus LS 2017 vs Chrysler 300C 2015
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 3.4 - 3.5 | 3.6 - 6.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 315 - 421 HP | 286 - 476 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 - 600 NM | 340 - 637 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.6 - 6.5 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.6 - 9.9 | 10.2 - 13.0 | |
|
Lexus LS petrol engines consumes on average 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Chrysler 300C. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.24 m | 5.05 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.48 m | |
| Lexus LS is 18 cm longer than the Chrysler 300C, width is practically the same , while the height of Lexus LS is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 480 litres | 462 litres | |
| Lexus LS has 18 litres more trunk space than the Chrysler 300C. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`675 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Lexus LS has
|
| |