Lexus GX 2002 vs Land Rover Range Rover 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 4.7 (petrol) | 2.9 - 4.4 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 238 - 270 HP | 174 - 396 HP | |
| Torque: | 434 - 447 NM | 390 - 640 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 - 8.9 seconds | 7.5 - 13.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.8 - 14.7 | 11.3 - 16.0 | |
|
Lexus GX petrol engines consumes on average 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Land Rover Range Rover. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.82 m | 4.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.96 m | |
| Height: | 1.88 m | 1.82 m | |
|
Lexus GX is smaller, but higher. Lexus GX is 13 cm shorter than the Land Rover Range Rover, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Lexus GX is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1238 litres | 535 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2513 litres | no data | |
|
Lexus GX has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Lexus GX has 703 litres more trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover. The Land Rover Range Rover may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Lexus GX is 0.8 metres more than that of the Land Rover Range Rover, which means Lexus GX can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`793 | ~ 3`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 12 200 | 7200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Lexus GX has
|
Land Rover Range Rover has
| |