Lexus CT 2014 vs Volvo V40 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lexus CT is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Volvo V40 has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 1.8 (petrol) | 1.6 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 99 HP | 115 - 254 HP | |
| Torque: | 142 NM | 220 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 6.3 - 12.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.6 | 3.2 - 9.0 | |
|
Lexus CT petrol engines consumes on average 2.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo V40. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Ground clearance: | 130 mm (5.1 inches) | 133 mm (5.2 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.35 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Lexus CT is smaller, but slightly higher. Lexus CT is 2 cm shorter than the Volvo V40, 7 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 375 litres | 335 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
985 litres | no data | |
|
Lexus CT has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Lexus CT has 40 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V40. The Volvo V40 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`790 | ~ 1`976 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 9000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Lexus CT has
|
Volvo V40 has
| |