Land Rover Range Rover 1993 vs Toyota 4-Runner 1990
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 113 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 265 NM | 215 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 19.8 seconds | 22 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 23 HP more power than Toyota 4-Runner, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Toyota 4-Runner. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.9 | 11.8 | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Range Rover consumes 2.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota 4-Runner, which means that by driving the Land Rover Range Rover over 15,000 km in a year you can save 435 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 890 km in combined cycle | 550 km in combined cycle | |
| Land Rover Range Rover gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - Part time 4WD | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 300'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Land Rover Discovery, Land Rover Defender | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Range Rover might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.81 m | 1.75 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover is 1 cm shorter than the Toyota 4-Runner, 13 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1200 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2100 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover is 0.5 metres more than that of the Toyota 4-Runner, which means Land Rover Range Rover can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 2`430 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 9800 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Toyota 4-Runner has
| |