Land Rover Range Rover 1993 vs Nissan Pathfinder 1990

 
Land Rover Range Rover
1993 - 1995
Nissan Pathfinder
1990 - 1994
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 2.5 Diesel3.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 113 HP153 HP
Torque: 265 NM244 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 19.8 secondsn/a seconds
Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 40 HP less power than Nissan Pathfinder, but torque is 21 NM more than Nissan Pathfinder.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.9no data
Fuel tank capacity: 80 litres80 litres

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 440'000 km540'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Nissan Pathfinder engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 12 years16 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Land Rover Discovery, Land Rover DefenderUsed only for this car
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.
Hydraulic tappets: noyes
The Nissan Pathfinder engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.

Dimensions

Length: 4.48 m4.37 m
Width: 1.82 m1.69 m
Height: 1.81 m1.67 m
Land Rover Range Rover is larger.
Land Rover Range Rover is 12 cm longer than the Nissan Pathfinder, 13 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 14 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no data890 litres
Turning diameter: 11.9 metersno data
Gross weight (kg): 3`500no data
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 9800no data
Pros and Cons:
    Nissan Pathfinder has
    • more power
    • longer expected engine lifespan
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv