Land Rover Range Rover 1993 vs Nissan Terrano 1993
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.7 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | no data | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 113 HP | 101 HP | |
| Torque: | 265 NM | 221 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 18.3 seconds | 19.9 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 12 HP more power than Nissan Terrano, whereas torque is 44 NM more than Nissan Terrano. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | 10.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.0 l/100km | 11.4 l/100km | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Range Rover consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Terrano, which means that by driving the Land Rover Range Rover over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Range Rover consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Terrano. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
| 720 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 530'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Nissan Terrano engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 22 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Land Rover Discovery, Land Rover Defender | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.58 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.81 m | 1.81 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover is 10 cm shorter than the Nissan Terrano, 8 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 115 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1900 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover is 0.4 metres more than that of the Nissan Terrano, which means Land Rover Range Rover can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 2`580 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 9800 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Nissan Terrano has
| |