Land Rover Range Rover 1989 vs Toyota 4-Runner 1990

 
Land Rover Range Rover
1989 - 1993
Toyota 4-Runner
1990 - 1993
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.5 Diesel2.4 Diesel

Performance

Power: 121 HP90 HP
Torque: 284 NM215 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 19.5 seconds22 seconds
Land Rover Range Rover is more dynamic to drive.
Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 31 HP more power than Toyota 4-Runner, whereas torque is 69 NM more than Toyota 4-Runner. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 10.311.8
The Land Rover Range Rover is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Land Rover Range Rover consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota 4-Runner, which means that by driving the Land Rover Range Rover over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 80 litres65 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 770 km in combined cycle550 km in combined cycle
Land Rover Range Rover gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)4x4 - Part time 4WD

Dimensions

Length: 4.48 m4.49 m
Width: 1.82 m1.69 m
Height: 1.81 m1.75 m
Land Rover Range Rover is 1 cm shorter than the Toyota 4-Runner, 13 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 6 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no data1200 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data2100 litres
Turning diameter: 11.9 meters11.4 meters
The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover is 0.5 metres more than that of the Toyota 4-Runner, which means Land Rover Range Rover can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 3`5002`430
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 98001800
Pros and Cons: Land Rover Range Rover has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Toyota 4-Runner has
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv