Land Rover Range Rover 2002 vs Dodge Durango 1998
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.4 Petrol | 5.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 282 HP | 236 HP | |
| Torque: | 440 NM | 407 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 20.2 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 46 HP more power than Dodge Durango, whereas torque is 33 NM more than Dodge Durango. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover reaches 100 km/h speed 11 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 16.2 | 16.8 | |
| Land Rover Range Rover consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Dodge Durango, which means that by driving the Land Rover Range Rover over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 100 litres | 95 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 560 km in combined cycle | |
| 790 km on highway | 640 km on highway | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.91 m | |
| Width: | 1.96 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.84 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is larger, but slightly lower. Land Rover Range Rover is 4 cm longer than the Dodge Durango, 14 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 532 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2482 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 2`903 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5400 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Dodge Durango has
| |