Land Rover Range Rover 2002 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2000
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.9 Diesel | 3.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 165 HP | |
| Torque: | 390 NM | 373 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.6 seconds | 13.8 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 12 HP more power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 17 NM more than Mitsubishi Pajero. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.3 | 10.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 12.2 l/100km | 10.4 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Pajero is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Range Rover consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover could require 120 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Range Rover consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 100 litres | 90 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 1060 km on highway | 1030 km on highway | ||
| 810 km with real consumption | 860 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.96 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.86 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is larger, but slightly lower. Land Rover Range Rover is 15 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 8 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 3`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 5400 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |