Land Rover Range Rover 2006 vs BMW X6 2008
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.6 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 272 HP | 286 HP | |
| Torque: | 640 NM | 580 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 6.9 seconds | |
| Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 14 HP less power than BMW X6, but torque is 60 NM more than BMW X6. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 8.3 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 100 litres | 85 litres | |
| 800 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Land Rover Range Rover Sport | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW X5, BMW 7 sērija, BMW X3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW X6 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.88 m | |
| Width: | 1.96 m | 1.98 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.69 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover is 7 cm longer than the BMW X6, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 13 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 535 litres | 570 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1450 litres | |
|
BMW X6 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Land Rover Range Rover has 35 litres less trunk space than the BMW X6. This could mean that the Land Rover Range Rover uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 12.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover is 1.2 metres less than that of the BMW X6, which means Land Rover Range Rover can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 2`710 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 7000 | 15 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
BMW X6 has
| |