Land Rover Range Rover 2013 vs Dodge Durango 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.0 Petrol | 3.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 510 HP | 294 HP | |
| Torque: | 625 NM | 353 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.4 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 216 HP more power than Dodge Durango, whereas torque is 272 NM more than Dodge Durango. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.8 | 11.2 | |
|
The Dodge Durango is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Range Rover consumes 2.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Dodge Durango, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover could require 390 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 105 litres | 93 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 1060 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 460'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Dodge Durango engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover Sport, Jaguar XJ | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Jeep Grand Cherokee, Chrysler Grand Voyager, Chrysler 300C, Jeep Wrangler | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Dodge Durango might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Dodge Durango engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.00 m | 5.11 m | |
| Width: | 2.07 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.80 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover is 11 cm shorter than the Dodge Durango, 15 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 490 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 490 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 550 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2030 litres | 2410 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Dodge Durango (by 380 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 12.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover is 0.2 metres less than that of the Dodge Durango. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`150 | 2`948 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 51 000 | 32 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Dodge Durango has
| |