Land Rover Range Rover 2013 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.4 Diesel | 3.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 339 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 700 NM | 373 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.9 seconds | 14 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 169 HP more power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 327 NM more than Mitsubishi Pajero. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover reaches 100 km/h speed 7.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | 10.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.9 l/100km | 11.9 l/100km | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Range Rover consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that by driving the Land Rover Range Rover over 15,000 km in a year you can save 285 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 105 litres | 90 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1200 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 1380 km on highway | 1120 km on highway | ||
| 880 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.00 m | 4.90 m | |
| Width: | 2.07 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.87 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is larger, but slightly lower. Land Rover Range Rover is 10 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 19 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 215 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2030 litres | 1790 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover has more luggage capacity. Land Rover Range Rover has 335 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Pajero. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Land Rover Range Rover (by 240 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover is 0.9 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means Land Rover Range Rover can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`200 | 3`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 51 000 | 11 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |