Land Rover Range Rover 2002 vs Mercedes ML 2001
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Land Rover Range Rover is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Mercedes ML has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 2.9 - 4.4 | 2.7 - 5.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 - 282 HP | 163 - 347 HP | |
| Torque: | 390 - 440 NM | 310 - 560 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 - 13.6 seconds | 6.7 - 12.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.3 - 16.2 | 9.4 - 14.8 | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover petrol engines consumes on average 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mercedes ML. On average, Land Rover Range Rover equipped with diesel engines consume 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes ML. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.96 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.82 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is larger. Land Rover Range Rover is 31 cm longer than the Mercedes ML, 11 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover is 0.3 metres less than that of the Mercedes ML. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`500 | ~ 3`481 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 5400 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Mercedes ML has
| |