Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2009 vs Mercedes ML 2008

 
Land Rover Range Rover Sport
2009 - 2013
Mercedes ML
2008 - 2011
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 3.6 Diesel4.0 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing chainDouble-row timing chain

Performance

Power: 272 HP306 HP
Torque: 640 NM700 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.2 seconds6.5 seconds
Mercedes ML is a more dynamic driving.
Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine produces 34 HP less power than Mercedes ML, whereas torque is 60 NM less than Mercedes ML. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Range Rover Sport reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): no data11.0

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 480'000 km440'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 4 years8 years
Engine spread: Used also on Land Rover Range RoverInstalled on at least 3 other car models, including Mercedes E klase, Mercedes S klase, Mercedes GL
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mercedes ML might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.78 m4.78 m
Width: 2.00 m1.91 m
Height: 1.78 m1.82 m
Land Rover Range Rover Sport is larger, but slightly lower.
Land Rover Range Rover Sport and Mercedes ML are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: no data551 litres
Turning diameter: no data12 meters
Gross weight (kg): 3`1752`950
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): 10 2009000
Pros and Cons: Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
  • longer expected engine lifespan
Mercedes ML has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv