Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2009 vs Volvo XC90 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 245 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 600 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine produces 82 HP more power than Volvo XC90, whereas torque is 260 NM more than Volvo XC90. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover Sport reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 | 8.2 | |
|
The Volvo XC90 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Range Rover Sport consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover Sport could require 150 litres more fuel. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 3 cm shorter than the Volvo XC90, 7 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 249 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 249 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 600 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1837 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`175 | 2`680 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 200 | 12 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |