Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2009 vs Volvo XC90 2006

 
Land Rover Range Rover Sport
2009 - 2013
Volvo XC90
2006 - 2011
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 3.0 Diesel2.4 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing chain and beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 245 HP185 HP
Torque: 600 NM400 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.3 seconds12 seconds
Land Rover Range Rover Sport is more dynamic to drive.
Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine produces 60 HP more power than Volvo XC90, whereas torque is 200 NM more than Volvo XC90. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover Sport reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.28.5
Real fuel consumption: 12.1 l/100km10.1 l/100km
The Volvo XC90 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Land Rover Range Rover Sport consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover Sport could require 105 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Range Rover Sport consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 420'000 km480'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volvo XC90 engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 15 years5 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Land Rover DiscoveryInstalled on at least 5 other car models, including Volvo V70, Volvo S80, Volvo S60, Volvo XC70, Volvo XC60
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.

Dimensions

Length: 4.78 m4.81 m
Width: 2.00 m1.90 m
Height: 1.78 m1.78 m
Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 3 cm shorter than the Volvo XC90, 10 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Seats: no data7 seats
Trunk capacity: no data249 litres
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: no data249 litres
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: no data613 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1837 litres
Turning diameter: no data12.5 meters
Gross weight (kg): 3`1752`750
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
low
Average price (€): 10 2009000
Pros and Cons: Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
Volvo XC90 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv