Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2009 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 5.7 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 245 HP | 326 HP | |
| Torque: | 600 NM | 500 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 7.1 seconds | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine produces 81 HP less power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, but torque is 100 NM more than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Range Rover Sport reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 | 15.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 12.1 l/100km | 15.6 l/100km | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover Sport is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Range Rover Sport consumes 6.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that by driving the Land Rover Range Rover Sport over 15,000 km in a year you can save 930 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Range Rover Sport consumes 3.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 520'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jeep Grand Cherokee engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 4 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Land Rover Discovery | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chrysler 300C, Dodge Charger | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Range Rover Sport might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.75 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport is larger. Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 3 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 13 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 978 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1909 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`175 | 2`750 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 10 200 | 6200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |