Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2009 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 4.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 245 HP | 282 HP | |
| Torque: | 600 NM | 385 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine produces 37 HP less power than Toyota Land Cruiser, but torque is 215 NM more than Toyota Land Cruiser. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Range Rover Sport reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 | 10.8 | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover Sport is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Range Rover Sport consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means that by driving the Land Rover Range Rover Sport over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 22 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Land Rover Discovery | Used also on Toyota Tundra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.76 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.89 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport is larger, but lower. Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 2 cm longer than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 12 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 104 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1930 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`175 | 2`900 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 200 | 19 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |