Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2009 vs Audi Q7 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 245 HP | 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 600 NM | 550 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine produces 5 HP more power than Audi Q7, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Audi Q7. Despite the higher power, Land Rover Range Rover Sport reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 | 9.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 12.1 l/100km | 11.2 l/100km | |
|
The Audi Q7 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Range Rover Sport consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q7, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover Sport could require 15 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Range Rover Sport consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q7. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 5.09 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.98 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.74 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 30 cm shorter than the Audi Q7, 2 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 775 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2035 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`175 | 3`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 10 200 | 17 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
|
Audi Q7 has
| |