Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2009 vs Mercedes ML 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 3.0 - 5.0 | 3.0 - 6.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 245 - 510 HP | 190 - 510 HP | |
| Torque: | 315 - 640 NM | 350 - 700 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.2 - 9.3 seconds | 5 - 9.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 - 15.0 | 8.4 - 16.5 | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport petrol engines consumes on average 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mercedes ML. On average, Land Rover Range Rover Sport equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes ML. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 2.12 m | 1.91 m | |
| Height: | 1.81 m | 1.82 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport is larger, but slightly lower. Land Rover Range Rover Sport and Mercedes ML are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 551 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`134 | ~ 2`854 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 10 200 | 9000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
|
Mercedes ML has
| |