Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2009 vs BMW X5 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 3.0 - 5.0 | 3.0 - 4.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 245 - 510 HP | 245 - 408 HP | |
| Torque: | 315 - 640 NM | 400 - 740 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.2 - 9.3 seconds | 5.4 - 7.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 - 15.0 | 7.4 - 12.5 | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport petrol engines consumes on average 3.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than BMW X5. On average, Land Rover Range Rover Sport equipped with diesel engines consume 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X5. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.86 m | |
| Width: | 2.12 m | 1.95 m | |
| Height: | 1.81 m | 1.78 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 7 cm shorter than the BMW X5, 17 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 620 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1750 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`134 | ~ 2`799 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 10 200 | 14 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
|
BMW X5 has
| |