Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2017 vs Lexus GX 2019
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 5.0 (petrol, diesel) | 4.6 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 249 - 575 HP | 296 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 - 740 NM | 438 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.5 - 7.6 seconds | 8.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 - 12.8 | 12.8 | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport petrol engines consumes on average 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Lexus GX. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.88 m | 4.88 m | |
| Width: | 2.07 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.89 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport and Lexus GX are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 780 litres | 621 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1832 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has more luggage capacity. Land Rover Range Rover Sport has 159 litres more trunk space than the Lexus GX. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 0.8 metres more than that of the Lexus GX, which means Land Rover Range Rover Sport can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`031 | ~ 2`990 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 64 000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
|
Lexus GX has
| |