Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2011 vs Jeep Cherokee 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine produces 20 HP less power than Jeep Cherokee, but torque is 50 NM more than Jeep Cherokee. Despite less power, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 5.8 | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.62 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.67 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 27 cm shorter than the Jeep Cherokee, 4 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 412 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has 138 litres more trunk space than the Jeep Cherokee. The Jeep Cherokee may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 0.3 metres less than that of the Jeep Cherokee. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`350 | 2`475 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Jeep Cherokee scores higher in safety tests. The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 15 800 | 13 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
|
Jeep Cherokee has
| |