Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2011 vs Jeep Cherokee 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine produces 10 HP more power than Jeep Cherokee, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Jeep Cherokee. Despite the higher power, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 5.3 | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.62 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.67 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 27 cm shorter than the Jeep Cherokee, 4 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 412 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has 138 litres more trunk space than the Jeep Cherokee. The Jeep Cherokee may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`350 | 2`291 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Jeep Cherokee scores higher in safety tests. The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 15 800 | 13 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
|
Jeep Cherokee has
| |