Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2010 vs Audi Q5 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 420 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine produces 20 HP more power than Audi Q5, whereas torque is 70 NM more than Audi Q5. Despite the higher power, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 6.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.5 l/100km | 8.0 l/100km | |
|
By specification Land Rover Range Rover Evoque consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q5, which means that by driving the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q5. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1070 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
| 1150 km on highway | 1290 km on highway | ||
| 700 km with real consumption | 930 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 460'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Freelander, Jaguar XF | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Audi A4, Seat Altea, Audi A5, Seat Leon, Seat Exeo | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.97 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.65 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 27 cm shorter than the Audi Q5, 7 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 575 litres | 540 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1560 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has 35 litres more trunk space than the Audi Q5. The Audi Q5 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 0.7 metres less than that of the Audi Q5, which means Land Rover Range Rover Evoque can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`350 | 2`310 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Audi Q5 is better rated in child safety tests. The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 15 000 | 11 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
|
Audi Q5 has
| |