Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2015 vs Dacia Duster 2017
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 150 HP | 90 HP | |
Torque: | 380 NM | 200 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 13.8 seconds | |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine produces 60 HP more power than Dacia Duster, whereas torque is 180 NM more than Dacia Duster. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover Evoque reaches 100 km/h speed 3.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 4.4 | |
The Dacia Duster is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Dacia Duster, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque could require 105 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 57 litres | 50 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1110 km in combined cycle | 1130 km in combined cycle | |
1260 km on highway | 1130 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 9 years | 12 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Jaguar XE, Land Rover Discovery Sport | Installed on at least 16 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Dacia Duster might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.37 m | 4.34 m | |
Width: | 1.99 m | 1.80 m | |
Height: | 1.66 m | 1.69 m | |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is larger, but slightly lower. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 3 cm longer than the Dacia Duster, 18 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 3 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 575 litres | 445 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1478 litres | |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage capacity. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has 130 litres more trunk space than the Dacia Duster. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 10.1 meters | |
The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 1.2 metres more than that of the Dacia Duster, which means Land Rover Range Rover Evoque can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`350 | 1`801 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | low | |
Average price (€): | 21 800 | 11 000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
|
Dacia Duster has
| |