Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2013 vs Audi Q3 2014
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.2 | 1.4 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 - 240 HP | 125 - 367 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 - 400 NM | 220 - 465 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 - 11.2 seconds | 4.4 - 10.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 4.2 - 8.6 | |
|
On average, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque equipped with diesel engines consume 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.61 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 3 cm shorter than the Audi Q3, 6 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 460 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1365 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has 90 litres more trunk space than the Audi Q3. The Audi Q3 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 0.5 metres less than that of the Audi Q3, which means Land Rover Range Rover Evoque can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`350 | ~ 2`130 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 23 400 | 17 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
|
Audi Q3 has
| |