Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2013 vs Audi Q2 2016
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.2 | 1.0 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 - 240 HP | 116 - 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 - 400 NM | 200 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 - 11.2 seconds | 6.5 - 10.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 4.4 - 5.4 | |
|
On average, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque equipped with diesel engines consume 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q2. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.19 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.51 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is larger. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 16 cm longer than the Audi Q2, 10 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 405 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1050 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage capacity. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has 145 litres more trunk space than the Audi Q2. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is 0.2 metres more than that of the Audi Q2. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`350 | ~ 1`920 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 23 400 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
|
Audi Q2 has
| |