Land Rover Discovery 1990 vs Jeep Cherokee 1995
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 4.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 155 HP | 184 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 NM | 290 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.7 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
|
Jeep Cherokee is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Discovery engine produces 29 HP less power than Jeep Cherokee, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Jeep Cherokee. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Discovery reaches 100 km/h speed 4.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 15.6 | 12.8 | |
|
The Jeep Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Discovery consumes 2.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Discovery could require 420 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 89 litres | 76 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 570 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - Full time 4WD | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.24 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.93 m | 1.62 m | |
| Land Rover Discovery is 28 cm longer than the Jeep Cherokee, width is practically the same , while the height of Land Rover Discovery is 31 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1290 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1970 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Discovery is 1.1 metres more than that of the Jeep Cherokee, which means Land Rover Discovery can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`720 | 3`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Discovery has
|
Jeep Cherokee has
| |