Land Rover Discovery 1994 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2001
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.7 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 113 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 265 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 20.6 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Discovery engine produces 50 HP less power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, whereas torque is 135 NM less than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Discovery reaches 100 km/h speed 9.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 | 9.7 | |
| Land Rover Discovery consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Discovery could require 30 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 89 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 890 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 1090 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| Land Rover Discovery gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - Full time 4WD | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jeep Grand Cherokee engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 3 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Land Rover Defender | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Discovery might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Jeep Grand Cherokee engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.91 m | 1.84 m | |
|
Land Rover Discovery is smaller, but higher. Land Rover Discovery is 13 cm shorter than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Land Rover Discovery is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1104 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2047 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Discovery is 0.1 metres more than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`720 | 2`506 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Discovery has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |