Land Rover Discovery 1990 vs Land Rover Range Rover 1995
Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 113 HP | 136 HP | |
Torque: | 265 NM | 270 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 18.5 seconds | 17.5 seconds | |
Land Rover Range Rover is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Discovery engine produces 23 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover, whereas torque is 5 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Discovery reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.9 | 11.4 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 10.7 l/100km | 11.9 l/100km | |
The Land Rover Discovery is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Discovery consumes 2.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover, which means that by driving the Land Rover Discovery over 15,000 km in a year you can save 375 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Discovery consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 89 litres | 90 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
1180 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
830 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
Land Rover Discovery gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - Full time 4WD | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 420'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 12 years | 8 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Land Rover Defender | Used only for this car | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Discovery might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
The Land Rover Range Rover engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.48 m | 4.71 m | |
Width: | 1.79 m | 1.89 m | |
Height: | 1.91 m | 1.82 m | |
Land Rover Discovery is smaller, but higher. Land Rover Discovery is 23 cm shorter than the Land Rover Range Rover, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Land Rover Discovery is 9 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 1290 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1970 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.9 meters | |
The turning circle of the Land Rover Discovery is 0.1 metres more than that of the Land Rover Range Rover. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`720 | 3`500 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 2600 | 3400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Discovery has
|
Land Rover Range Rover has
| |