Land Rover Discovery 2009 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 245 HP | 247 HP | |
| Torque: | 600 NM | 570 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 seconds | 8.2 seconds | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Discovery engine produces 2 HP less power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, but torque is 30 NM more than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Discovery reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 | 7.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.2 l/100km | 8.5 l/100km | |
|
The Jeep Grand Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Discovery consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Discovery could require 270 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Discovery consumes 2.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 82 litres | 89 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 1180 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km on highway | 1360 km on highway | ||
| 730 km with real consumption | 1040 km with real consumption | ||
| Jeep Grand Cherokee gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - Full time 4WD | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Land Rover Range Rover Sport | Used also on Chrysler 300C | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Discovery might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 4.83 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.89 m | 1.78 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 782 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1554 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Discovery is 0.2 metres less than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`240 | 2`949 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 13 200 | 26 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Discovery has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |